Tag Archives: mountaintop removal mining

Waving hundred dollar bills for revestment

Harlan from Ivy Hill web cam

Harlan from Ivy Hill web cam

No one ever knew there was coal in them mountains

Till the man from the Northeast arrived,

Waving hundred dollar bills,

Said I’ll pay you for your minerals . . .

You’ll never leave Harlan alive, Darrell Scott

The mountains haven’t belonged to the mountain people for a long time.  Not since the coal and logging interests first waved those hundred dollar bills.  Since then, those interests just been tradin’ it back and forth.

So what of the mountains not belonging to the people?  I doubt that that offends many folk.  But it offends me.  I guess the part that bothers me the most is when people see the land, and especially the mountains, as a commodity to be bought and sold for a profit; as a repository of minerals or timber to be extracted at any “reasonable” cost; as the perfect spot for a shopping center or a new subdivision; or as a new retirement development.  Anything other than a land to be revered and preserved or even a homestead to be passed on from generation to generation.  But it also offends me that those same companies imported labor that the land could not sustain unless coal was king.

Lord knows, the mountain land, apart from the few highland meadows, isn’t worth for much as most people think of land.  Farming?  Not really.  Most of that would be in the bottom land.  And thankfully the non-mining interests have retained some of that.  Well, except for the land where we now have the shopping centers that killed the towns.

But now, a hundred or so years after the first greenbacks were waved, is it possible for the mining and logging interests to revest the property in the people?  If it were, how would it be done?  Maybe it’s like unscrambling an egg and just can’t be done.  Or would be just darn hard.  But just because it’s not easy doesn’t mean that it shouldn’t be done.

Is it just me, or doesn’t it seem to reek of bad karma for people to have generated their own wealth on the backs of thousands of miners, and this after “taking” their land.  Or enticing people into a region which could not support that many people but for coal, and then abandoning them to that place that left them with no alternative livelihood when coal went bust.  Or, and I’m afraid that I’ll be pissing off a lot of my friends and family, then there are the lawyers who made money representing miners’ black lung cases, or the doctors who worked for the mining companies or even the hospitals.  Or the landlords who rented shacks to people who couldn’t afford to leave the mountains to make a better living when coal went down.  But meanwhile, no one was stopping the mining.  I mean, doesn’t it just seem ridiculously wrong?  So, I’m just thinking that maybe they are ready to buy back some good karma through revestment and for working to reestablish a sustainable population base.

Some ideas:

  • Donation to a land trust of the land and/or mineral interests by the mining, logging, landlording companies/families.
  • Endowing with those funds a foundation, which would also be the repository for the purchase prices when the people buy the land.  The Foundation would support a return to traditional mountain ways:  for mountain arts and crafts through small business loans; for sustainable energy sources for the county, including grants for personal solar and wind generation; for loans for small (size-capped) farmsteads (that is, no factory farms or chicken houses).
  • County-wide covenants on land use, i.e., no uncontrolled subdivisions or highways peppered with shopping centers.  Now that’s an oxymoron — shopping “centers” that spread out for miles and killed the original shopping center, the downtown.  Hmmm.
  • Cap on county population based on studies demonstrating sustainable population.

Well, I’ll stop there for now because, frankly, I don’t have any more revestment ideas this evening.  And I truly apologize to those families, including my own, who mined coal or benefited from coal in the past and whom I have offended.  I am just hoping that we can put coal away as an artifact from a bygone era that has outlived its usefulness.  Like a toy covered by lead-based paint, we’d find a new paint, wouldn’t we?  Or would we say that the lead-based paint maker provided jobs, that the harm was being exaggerated, and that our children should just stop chewing on the toys?

The companies paid little for the land when they first acquired it.  They’ve more than made their money back.  It’s time for revestment.

Hoooeeeeeee!!!!! And here’s what I’m for

How many of us were feeling elation, glee, jubilation and a big HOOOOEEEEE before, during and after Inauguration Day?  Elation may be a difficult emotion to sustain, but I say that we need all of the elation, all of the positive movement, that we can stand to keep us moving forward to a new day.

I may garble this badly, but I remember reading, or maybe seeing on The Secret, where Mother Theresa said that she would not attend a Stop Hunger rally, but that if they held a Provide Food one, she’d be on the front row.  Many of our movements, and certainly the ones that I affiliate with, are to stop some practice that we oppose.  Mountaintop removal mining, for instance.  Or animal cruelty.  Or captive “hunting.”   Or factory farming. Or over-medication.  Or kids having high cholesterol because we don’t know how to feed them and they aren’t going outside anymore!!!  Ooops.  Well, I definitely oppose those!  But how do I ride this glee wave to a new “for” mentality, when I can’t, for the life of me, figure out how to end the “against” one.

But here are some things that I am for that underpin all the things that I am against, and maybe if I focus on these, I’ll find a clue:

//runningnessa.blogspot.com/2008/03/family-farms.html

From http://runningnessa.blogspot.com/2008/03/family-farms.html

1.  I am for honoring the dignity of all life.

2. I am for equivalence of worth.

3. I am for apologizing for mistakes and for forgiving them.

4. I am for making whole what has been rendered asunder.

5. I am for practices that sustain life in its full health.

6. I am for awareness of the wonder and awe of life.img_00371

7. I am for our doctors adding nutrition to their tool bag and for their teaching us how to be well.

8. I am for giggling in church and at funerals.

9. I am for loving life with the heart of a five-year-old.

10. I am for getting outside and playing.

For starters.

So, I’ll be thinking more about this “for” stuff.   And hoping that you’ll join me in being for honoring and respecting life.  Hoooooeeeee!

AFL-CIO, the mountains, Barack and hope

I wasn’t sure how to title this ramble.  It’s a little about mountaintop removal mining and a little about humanity.  So, come along, and see if you can find something worth considering.

I was in New Orleans for several days this week.  Up and out of my room by 5:30 or 6:00 a.m., cruising for coffee a cut above the stuff extruded from the delightful little gizmo in my room.  Starbucks are ubiquitous, thank the Lord, although not so much in New Orleans, I found.  But within a couple of blocks, I found my nectar, and wished I had a laptop so I could write in real-time.  But here is one incident that was memorable about my trip.

As I walked through the hotel lobby each morning, there was a great gathering of members of

UMWA button

UMWA button

AFL-CIO.  On the first morning, I spoke with a woman who was a member of the United Mine Workers of America.   I asked what the group was there for, and she explained that the AFL-CIO had been doing this volunteer day for the past 10 years or so in conjunction with the Martin Luther King, Jr., Day of Service.  They go to a different city every year, and work on a variety of community service projects, from home or business repair to meal delivery.  So, at a time when so many workers are being disproportionately impacted by the economic disaster that was perpetrated by Wall Street et al., they are on the street doing community service.  I managed to not get choked up while talking with the young woman, but I am so heartened by their volunteerism, and their continued commitment to others when I know that times are difficult at home, that I get choked up as I recall them.

I applaud the AFL-CIO, the UMWA and the other individual member unions and their members for who they are in the face of our country’s significant economic downturn.  I am wondering whether benefits from union dues helped to pay for their expenses.  Two options:  yes, they did, or no, they didn’t.  If they did, I am saying hallelujah for union dues and union benefits, which are now benefitting folks who didn’t pay those dues out of their wages, assuming they had some in the first place.  If the dues didn’t pay for the expenses, then we have just a slightly different thank you to give to the members and the unions, but one that some folks might find easier to give.

So, there I was, feeling all warm and grateful to this woman and her union.  But then realized that I really had to ask her what she thought about Mountaintop Removal Mining.  I had spoken only once personally to a miner about the practice, and I figured that it was about time to go there again.

Kayford Mountain, TN

Kayford Mountain, TN

Although she was a West Virginia deep miner and not involved personally in MRM, she said that it provided jobs, that the harms to the environment were exaggerated, and that the practice even improved the mountains by smoothing out the terrain.  I’ve heard those same arguments, pretty much unaltered, in every piece I’ve read in support of MRM.  So, I wasn’t surprised.  I expressed my view that I thought that this was just the latest in a long history of benefits to folks not from the region being weighed heavier than the damages to the people and resources of the region; that the smoothed-out terrain would not sustain crops or native understory plant life for an exceedingly long period of time; and that the damage to the water resource of the area would be reaped by the region, and not just the locals, within a reasonably short period of time.  She was no less unsurprised by my view.

We didn’t talk long.  I think we both knew that this was a conversation between two people who weren’t in a decision-making role, and was just so much flapping of jaws, as my eighth grade teacher used to say.  So, we parted, feeling a little helpless, I think.  But then there was the good news:  she was off to do community service for New Orleans, and I to do something, as part of my job, about cleaning up federal facilities.

As I walked away, I was left with the knowledge that not only was she not the enemy, that maybe there isn’t one.  Now, you have to get, this is huge for me.  I have an us-them mentality about issues that I feel emotionally.   Maybe most of us do.  And I feel the injustice of mountaintop removal mining deep in the heart of my heart.

Shepherd Fairey Hope Poster

Shepherd Fairey Hope Poster

But here’s what else I think.  I think that maybe our new President doesn’t have that same “us versus them” mentality.  He has demonstrated that difficult issues can be discussed without being grounded there.  I am thinking that maybe his Presidency has something to do with the moment that I had with the miner in New Orleans, where I realized that she wasn’t the enemy.  And most importantly for me, I realized that I may not have an enemy at all.  That Massey, God help me, may not be the enemy.  I don’t know where this is going.  I am still as unrelenting an opponent to this practice which takes all the horrors of mining and logging perpetrated against the people of Appalachia since the 1800′s and blows the scale off Google Earth.  But now I’m left with a basic question:  How does one behave in opposing a horror without an enemy to face off?  I think Martin Luther King, Jr., knew about that.  I think our new President knows about that.  Can I sustain this enemyless approach?  I hope for all of us that all of us can.

Mountaintop removal mining and losing Appalachian diversity

This news story may be old news to many of you, but I thought it might be worthwhile to share a couple of links just in case you are not a voracious reader of blogs and newsfeeds.  I am just beginning to learn what that even means.

Photo by Vivian Stockman, October 19, 2003

Photo by Vivian Stockman, October 19, 2003, found at http://www.ohvec.org/galleries/mountaintop_removal/007/

Robert Kennedy, Jr., testimony before Congressional Committee.  On December 12, 2008, Robert Kennedy, Jr., testified before the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming on the destructive and illegal practice of mountaintop removal mining and valley fill.  A video and transcript of his testimony is located at http://www.ilovemountains.org/news/455 and also at http://anniekatec.blogspot.com/2008/12/rfk-on-last-minute-bush-environmental.html

One interesting factoid from Kennedy’s testimony that I don’t recall learning as a geologist is that after North America’s last major ice age, North America was reseeded from the seed stock in the Southern Appalachians.  You see, North America, with the exception of our fine Appalachian mountains was either under ice or had largely become a tundric wasteland (I hope I didn’t offend any tundra fans).  After the ice receded, there was nothing but grassland and lowland forests, and the Appalachians basically created the flora, and thus the fauna, that persists today.  Because our mountains are some of the oldest and survived this recent ice age, they are among the most biologically diverse.

//appalachiantreks.blogspot.com

Photo by Peacock at http://appalachiantreks.blogspot.com

This makes the irresponsible onslaught of the mining companies and the complicity of the outgoing administration and the Army Corps of Engineers all the more egregious.

See also Forests in Peril: Tracking Deciduous Trees from Ice-Age Refuges into the Greenhouse World by University of Tennessee professor, Hazel R. Delacourt, Department of Ecology and  Evolutionary Biology for a scholastic summary of biodiversity of the Appalachian and the impacts that we all will face when this ecological gem is lost.