The Taiji dolphin drive hunt is not a cull. Alert the media.
If the captivity industry found that they had “bad breeding stock” and decided to kill the bad ones in order to “improve” their stock, that would be a cull.
If SeaWorld decided that it needed to separate orca mothers from calves, the chief husbandry officer might, indeed, “cull” his collection. But of course, SeaWorld says that it doesn’t do that. <WINK>
If a “wildlife manager” found that one species was diseased or was truly overtaking another species, that might be a cull.
The Taiji drive hunt has nothing to do with removing dolphins for the fishing industry, rumors by the dolphin hunters to the contrary. AND EVEN IF IT WERE TRUE that they were killing dolphins to restore fish stocks, it is human overfishing that has impacted the fish stocks of Japan, not the activity of dolphins. And the response of humans to restore a balance among wildlife that we caused (when we really need to stop the offending human actions) should not be termed a “cull”.
Even if properly used, the term “cull” is just another of those words we’ve made up to insulate ourselves from the reality of our actions. “Cull” is just another name for “kill” when we don’t want to see the blood on our opposable-thumbed hands.
But, of course, the reality of the drive hunt is that it is financed, underwritten and generally made lucrative by the large sums paid by the aquarium industry for a few men to capture, kidnap and otherwise steal dolphins, to prop up a 20th Century industry that should be dying and dwindling, instead of swindling us all by taking the lives of the wild ones. ALERT THE MEDIA.