The Georgia Aquarium is promoting its 10th annual fundraiser, Aqua Vino Nights. According to the Georgia Aquarium, the event offers an opportunity to “witness the remarkable behavior of social animals and socialites” for the ticket price of $150 to $325 (Georgia Aquarium members pay less), for a cause. The Georgia Aquarium says that the cause is its important southern sea otter research conservation initiatives. But what other cause does the event support?
Aqua Vino Nights: exploiting some marine mammals to “conserve” others
If one traces the money trail for the Georgia Aquarium’s various “initiatives”, he may find a direct trail supporting the aquarium’s claims. But what of the less direct (or, rather, less obvious) trail? What does one find? In the Georgia Aquarium’s own words, one will find “remarkable . . . social animals” held for a lifetime of captivity, doing tricks for a paying public.
Beluga whales captured and held in tanks in Russia awaiting their “disposition.” Photo credit M. Lanovoy
Beluga Whales. One will find the beluga whales and dolphins housed in concrete tanks, including the window in the Georgia Aquarium ballroom which allows guests to party down while watching the beluga whales. These whales, who in the wild swim in family and community groups of tens to hundreds and traverse hundreds of miles in regular migration in Arctic waters, are relegated to a morbidly small tank. In its short operation time, four beluga whales have died (the link does not include the death in 2015 of Maris’ latest calf) in the Georgia Aquarium’s tank, and one, Nico, died in 2009 about three weeks after being transported to SeaWorld of Texas.
Despite its morbidity record, or perhaps because of it, the Georgia Aquarium is seeking to import 18 wild-caught Russian beluga whales. The aquarium awaits the decision of Federal District Judge Amy Totenberg, following an August 14, 2015, hearing in which NOAA, the Georgia Aquarium and intervenors Animal Welfare Institute, Whale and Dolphin Conservation, Cetacean Institute International and others presented their arguments for summary judgment.
Beluga whales in Russian waters. The scale may difficult to grasp, but not so difficult that life in a tank is revealed to be a horrid life sentence. Image from the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Anyone who has seen the beluga whales up close at the Georgia Aquarium will undoubtedly come away with a sense of wonder. “Wonder” is exactly what its customers should be doing. They should wonder why aquariums and marine parks exploit certain species while claiming that captivity and exploitation of “remarkable . . . social animals” are necessary to conserve?
The beluga tank serves as a backdrop to the Georgia Aquarium’s ballroom. Photo from the Georgia Aquarium flickr photos.
Dolphins. And then there are the dolphins, another of the “remarkable . . . social animals” whom the Georgia Aquarium keeps captive. The Georgia Aquarium currently holds 13 dolphins in its tank system, including five who were shipped from SeaWorld San Diego on May 13, 2014, but excluding
Shaka, wild-caught, shipped from the Georgia Aquarium to Marineland Florida on December 9, 2013. Photo from Dolphin Quest.
Shaka and Lily, who were part of the original eleven dolphins at the Georgia Aquarium, subsequently shipped to its Marineland location on December 9, 2013.
These 15 currently-alive dolphins tell only a thinly-veiled version of the story. Behind that thin veil are the thousands of dolphins who have been captured (or bred from those captured) by the aquarium and marine park industry. Marineland Florida, now owned by the Georgia Aquarium, was one of the first of such attractions in the United States. Its 14 currently-living dolphins, including two who were captured in the early 1970s, mask a record of death that will shock anyone except the callous. A 2004 report by the Sun-Sentinel noted that “Seaquarium has lost 64 of 89 dolphins since 1972. Of those whose age could be determined, more than half died at 10 or younger, including 16 in their first year.” And that was 2004. (Because the required record-keeping (16 U.S.C. §1374(c)(10)) is unattached to any meaningful enforcement, one wonders whether it is reasonable to have confidence in the accuracy and timeliness of the records, which are accessible via the Freedom of Information Act.)
Capturing for the aquarium and marine park industry. While the Georgia Aquarium fights to be able to import wild-caught marine mammals, other parts of the world do not have to wage the same fight to capture them. Even killing them en masse, intentionally, during the capture process is permitted. In Taiji, Japan, they do not capture beluga whales because Taiji is not located in the Arctic; they capture, and kill, the marine mammals that migrate in its waters.
On September 18, 2015, a community of 75 to 80 bottlenose dolphins were herded in a “drive hunt” into a small cove. For two days, family members were ripped from one another, with the ones prettiest and deemed most suitable for displays taken for the aquarium and marine park industry. Fifty, or approximately two-thirds of the community, was captured in a process that is neither humane nor sustainable.
This photo and others taken by the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society reveal some of the terror that the capturing process causes in the dolphins. While we do not know what dolphins “feel”, we do know that members of the closely-knit dolphin communities will fight to stay together, even at their own risk, during this process. Yesterday’s image of the dolphin mother and calf being separated so that the mother could be taken into captivity is horrific to an ethical human. The calf, not taken with his mother, is now condemned to whatever “life” can reasonably be expected, without the relationship with his mother that would have taught him survival skills.
Dolphins are trapped under a net in the process of capturing, subduing and separating dolphins for the aquarium industry. Photo credit Sea Shepherd Conservation Society.
But to an aquarium industry and its supporters (ticket-purchasers) this mother-calf separation is invisible. The predictable death of the calf will not be noted in a statistic anywhere, certainly not in the quota allowed by the Japanese Fisheries Ministry. His death and the fate of the pod decimated by the Taiji dolphin hunters will fade into oblivion. It will certainly not be reported by the industry that will be profitable only so long as facts such as these remain hidden from view.
The entire aquarium and marine park industry is culpable. The U.S. aquarium and marine park industry likes to proclaim, while it neglects to mention or even abandons the current effort of the Georgia Aquarium, that it no longer captures marine mammals from the wild. Further, it attempts to distance itself from the Taiji hunt. It does not want the paying public to connect the dots, but it is without question that the world aquarium and marine park industry has fashioned itself on the U.S. model of shows to attract the public to its turnstiles. The boom of U.S. aquariums that started in the 1950s and 1960s is only beginning in the rest of the world. China, Japan, the Middle East, islands of the Caribbean and elsewhere are busy playing catch-up to the mature U.S. industry.
But what has been revealed in the 50-plus years since the U.S. boom is that dolphins and whales are not suited to captivity. The statistics alone tell the tale. But these statistics and the stories behind them have been distilled into films and books that make the institution of marine mammal captivity anything but the benign image portrayed by the display industry. Films like Blackfish, A Fall from Freedom, Saving Flipper, A Whale of a Business, Vancouver Aquarium Uncovered, the to-be-released Born to be Free, and the Oscar-winning The Cove present the truth about an exploitative industry that should have been retired long before 2015. Books like Orca: The Whale Called Killer, Death at SeaWorld, Beneath the Surface and Of Orcas and Men fill in more details than can be captured in films. All of them reveal that the fascination with whales and dolphins in captivity is a morbid one
The aquarium and marine park industry is, however, profitable. Highly so. And as long as the public continues to pass through the cha-ching of the turnstile, the industry will continue to exploit dolphins and other marine mammals. The world aquarium and marine park industry, modeled after the U.S., uses dolphins and other marine mammals as replaceable, fungible attractions, much as the U.S. industry did in its early years, in a cycle of unending capture. In the U.S., aquariums and marine parks are beginning to feel the tide of history turning, thanks to the efforts of non-governmental organizations, authors and film-makers. The National Aquarium, for instance, ended its dolphin shows in 2014, but rumors of its ending dolphin captivity have not come to fruition. Yet.
Conservation is the new favorite word. In its efforts to “stay current” and face down the growing awareness of the horror of captivity for marine mammals, the U.S. aquarium and marine park industry is attempting to associate, in the public’s mind, captivity with conservation. “We do good works” is the new mantra. “Come to the aquarium and take part in conservation.” But the fact remains, and it is a fact, that it is the dolphin or beluga attraction that keeps the money flowing. The advertisement for the Aqua Vino event at the top of this post makes this perfectly clear. It is another fact, also born out by this event, that the conservation efforts of the aquarium industry are mainly focused on other species, not the main attractions. The new message to the public is that we must exploit to do good. But we are better and smarter than that. We know that there need be no link between the two. And we also know that if they are linked, the money for conservation is tainted with the morbid lives of sacrificed individuals.
Aqua Vino may be an event for a cause. But that cause is marine mammal captivity.
Trailer for Born to be Free: